Newspaper/Magazine Articles about San Felipe 2001


No Bad Days (Who Needs Electricity?)
Forget Miami. Gringos are retiring in Mexico because it's sunny, sandy and cheap

BY MARGOT ROOSEVELT/ San Felipe TIME Magazine 11 June 2001

At the monthly pancake breakfast of the San Felipe Association of Retired Persons, the talk is about how Beverly Stillwell, 71, is paying only $1,700 for bridgework "that would easily cost $4,000 in the States." How Nellie Kidwell, 84, forks over only $49 a year in property taxes for her two-bedroom, two-bath home near the beach. And how Rose Lahey's timid boyfriend won't drive down from California because "he's paranoid about Mexican bandidos." Says Lahey, 55, a retired letter carrier: "You're safer here than in L.A. any day - and it's better than going postal."

San Felipe is one of a handful of Mexican towns that have become magnets for gringo retirees, and another reason why it's often hard to tell where one country stops and the other begins. About 125 miles south of the border, this once tiny fishing village now stretches along the blue-green waters of the Sea of Cortez into a 50-mile-long cordon of dusty RV parks and mid-market subdivisions, all catering to seniors. Some 24,000 Mexicans and 9,000 norteños coexist here, more apart than together. There are separate services in English and Spanish at the Baptist church; Alcoholics Anonymous offers meetings for Anglos at 6, for Mexicans at 8. But everyone strolls along the seaside malecón to hear the mariachis and goes to the same black-market dealers for illegal hookups to U.S. DirecTV satellites. "It's great," says Lou Wells, 67, a former railroad clerk. "We get HBO, Showtime, and we can watch $150 pay-per-view fights for free!"

Cheap is one reason why many snowbirds spend 10 months a year in Mexico and then "vacation" back north during the hot summer. They can live comfortably on $500 a month, renting a plot for a trailer. Splurging, they can build an adobe mansion with a hot tub and a view of the sea for $80,000. A local doctor makes house calls for less than $20; prescription drugs often cost less than a third of their price in the U.S. - and for serious medical problems, a U.S. hospital is a three-hour drive away. At twilight, the dune buggies, piloted by ecstatic septuagenarians, dash through the desert sunsets.

San Felipe is no luxury resort. Few of the settlements have electricity. But refrigerators run on propane and computers on solar panels. Cell phones substitute for land lines. E-mail is offered through The Net, a computer service run by physicist Tony Colleraine, who retired early from defense contractor General Atomics and now hustles Mexican businesses to advertise on www.sanfelipe.com.mx.

Everyone makes adjustments to survive. "It terrified me that they don't put their babies in car seats," says Judy Hubbard, 64, a day-care provider from East Hampton, N.Y. "And the town doesn't pick up garbage for days. But I learned to live and let live." Now she volunteers as a counselor for methamphetamine addicts from the town slums.

San Felipe has its refugees - people fleeing the IRS and folks collecting disability checks at a phony U.S. address. And some people here do nothing but drink. Yet there is also Katherine Hammontre, a former legal secretary who moved here so she could keep six dogs "without the neighbors calling the cops." Her friends Bill and Kay Gabbard - a retired Marine Corps sergeant and his schoolteacher wife - distribute hundreds of Spanish-language textbooks to San Felipe schools. And Bruce Barber, a former food-company executive, combs the desert for the grave of a 16th century explorer. What brings them all to the far edge of the Sonoran desert? Lou Wells, a onetime railroad clerk, answers with a decal on the side of his VW dune buggy: no bad days.


Baja Brainstorm: Build Ports for Those Yachts
Mexican officials hope to increase the number of visiting boats by creating a long network of stops. Environmentalists worry about delicate ecosystem.

By CHRISTOPHER REYNOLDS, Times Travel Writer

Los Angeles Times Sunday 17 June 2001   

  Some people look at the Gulf of California and see a rare retreat for marine life and the occasional fishing boat or pleasure vessel. But when Mexican President Vicente Fox and his tourism advisors look at the same desert-fringed patch of salt water between Baja California and mainland Mexico, they see room for 76,400 yachts a year.
     That's nearly 10 times the estimated current traffic. Such an influx of upscale visitors, officials say, could be a boon for tourism and could mean a boost in jobs and quality of life for Baja, Sonora and Sinaloa residents who have endured decades of bad roads and ragtag government services.
     But environmental groups are worried that the same influx could undermine the rare ecology and stark natural beauty that make the peninsula unique. (They worry less about mainland Mexico, where the project calls mostly for upgrades of existing facilities, rather than new coastal construction.) They have asked for more details, but so far, those remain in short supply.
     The " Escalera Nautica " ("nautical route" is the Mexican government's translation) plan is to build a network of 22 ports in the next decade that form a route around Baja California's perimeter and along the mainland rim of the Gulf of California (better known in Mexico as the Sea of Cortes), stretching as far south as Mazatlan.
     With ports spaced about 120 nautical miles apart (that's about 138 miles on land), the network is intended to act as a sort of secular seafarers' version of the California mission system, easing exploration (and relaxation) for boaters.
     They will add docking, fueling, provisioning and radio communication facilities and in some cases restaurants and lodging.
     Tourism officials also hope for an increase in land-based visitors once those tourists realize that related road improvements will mean easier access to tourist attractions.
     FONATUR, the Mexican government's main tourism development agency, began meeting with state officials last year and announced Fox's backing for the project in February. (Similar plans had been proposed in 1976 and the mid-'90s but were never executed.)
     The first key piece of the project is the creation of a transpeninsular "dry canal," or "land bridge," about halfway down the peninsula to give boaters a 70-mile shortcut between the Gulf of California and the Pacific. The path now includes miles of rough rural road and is impractical for boat transport.
     Once completed, the path is intended to accommodate transport of boats as long as 55 feet.
     "We want to start building in July," said Juan Tintos Funcke, tourism secretary for the state of Baja California. If federal officials approve a request for $16.5 million, the road could be done by March, Tintos said.
     Under the plan, semitrucks will shuttle vessels between the sea and the ocean, using new or expanded facilities (including marina slips) at Santa Rosalillita on the Pacific side and the Bahia de los Angeles on the Gulf of California side. Currently, most boaters must sail all the way down the 820-mile-long peninsula, then loop around Cabo San Lucas to reach the Gulf of California. Between Ensenada and Cabo San Lucas there are virtually no marine services.
     A shortcut with a port network is "a great idea," said Pat Rains, coauthor of the "Mexico Boating Guide." "A lot of people have wished that this could happen."
     But Rains also noted that Mexican officials have raised, then shelved, other versions of this concept.
     The plan counts heavily on private investors, Tintos said, and requires cooperation among federal officials, four Mexican states and more than a dozen municipalities. He said many site selections are still tentative, depending on environmental review, and acknowledged that the goal of 76,400 boats a year is optimistic. And Tintos noted that the initial projection of $222 million in FONATUR funding in the next five years is only an estimate.
     Apart from the new and expanded port facilities, plans call for construction or expansion of 20 airports and airfields. Already, Tintos said, his state has spent about $2.5 million, and the federal department of Communications and Transportation has laid out about $7 million for early work on the Santa Rosalillita-Bahia de los Angeles road and related projects.
     The potential effects on the sparsely populated peninsula have raised sharp questioning from environmentalists.
     "Everywhere we go, Escalera Nautica is now the subject. But as far as I can see, they are not very well coordinated," said Patricia Martinez Rios, administrative director of Pro Esteros, an Ensenada-based wetlands protection group. "This is what concerns us--that they will start building and destroying without ... listening to the experts."
     But Martinez Rios said: "We are aware of the necessity of development for many communities. ... I think this is the best opportunity so far to really do correct planning, to really understand what sustainable development means. But we don't want to give any opinion before we know enough."
     She also would like the government to seek more citizen input. "The people who live in those places have not been asked," she said. In some little towns, Martinez Rios said, "they don't want to change their status from fishermen to ... servants of tourists."
     For his part, Tintos said many of the residents of Santa Rosalillita and Bahia de Los Angeles (less than 1,500 combined, mostly fishermen) see the project as a chance for economic betterment. He also said the success of the project depends upon its ability to highlight and protect the area's natural and cultural resources.
     Government officials, he said, are working on how to manage that. (And the process could get more complicated after Oct. 31, when Tintos and the rest of Baja California Gov. Alejandro Gonzalez Alcocer's cabinet leave office to make way for a newly elected state administration.)
     Five of the new project's 22 proposed ports are already full-service facilities: Ensenada, Cabo San Lucas, La Paz, Guaymas-San Carlos and Mazatlan. Seven others would be expanded: San Carlos (the one in Baja California), San Felipe, Loreto, Mulege, Santa Rosalia, Puerto Penasco and Topolobampo.
     New facilities would be built in 10 other locations: Cabo Colonet, Puerto Canoa, San Luis Gonzaga, Santa Rosalillita and Bahia de los Angeles (all in Baja California); Bahia de Tortuga, Punta Abreojos and San Juanico (all in Baja California Sur); Bahia Kino in Sonora and Altata in Sinaloa. Locations for proposed airfields and airports are not yet certain, Tintos said.
      Christopher Reynolds welcomes suggestions but cannot respond individually to letters and calls. Address comments to Travel Insider, Los Angeles Times, 202 W. 1st St., Los Angeles, CA 90012, or e-mail to chris.reynolds@latimes.com.